vitrohype

This man is so wrong, I have spotted his error and i am not even a geneticist just an amateur. He said that when DNA is removed still behaves the same as before the removal.
Only one thing that he did not mention that would be affected cell reproduction because that is the function of the DNA to code for the reproduction of the cell not to directly control cell functions.

Good video
Sounds logical.

Earlyer theology has dispute of predestination similar to later DNA teachings..

God bless Ron Paul in efforts to make sound monetary system based on valuable metals.

that is so interesting! i did not Know.. that the cell is Unaffected after the ‘Control Centre’– the Nucleus is removed from the cell. omg– this goes against everything i have learnt! LOL waooow.

ahh.. i did not catch that!.. yes– the cell would not be Able to reproduce…. since there are no chromosomes to give to the daughter cells!
i still think that besides that…it is pretty amazing .. to see the general behaviour of the cell unaffected after the Nucleus is removed. … since the DNA does control what happens inside the cell.. even if it is indirect…

This is FUCKING interesting.

It’s also part of the cellular response system. Environmental factors can signal the nucleus to turn on or off production of proteins. In the case of turning on production the cell may not have needed to prior to being enucleated so the protein would never get produced the cell would lack that beneficial tool and in many cases cecum and fail due to the inability to respond.
This guy is so far off base it’s not even funny. Truly this man is a criminal.

funny how studies of twins separated at birth counter everything this ‘man’ says.

funny how he says a belief switches on a gene AND genes are irrelevant. Did anyone else catch the LIE?

How old is this lecture? We’ve known for 10 years the it’s not one gene one protein. Post transcription editing is the basis of plurality of PROTEINS from identical code. This man should be locked up.

excellent work!